VetsLearn — Business & everyday work — 05: Measure workflow improvement honestly
Revision 2026-10-03; fictional training fixture.

OUTCOME
Compare a bounded AI-assisted workflow with a manual baseline.

INDEPENDENT TASK
Independent constructed cases: manual totals 20, 18, 22 min; assisted totals 15, 21, 19. The middle assisted output missed a required caveat and needs 4 extra minutes. Calculate corrected totals and propose a further trial.

STEPS
1. Include the four-minute correction.
2. Compare totals and quality failures.
3. Set a review owner, trial boundary and stop condition.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
- Manual total 60; corrected assisted total 59.
- Report one quality failure and only three constructed cases.
- Do not claim the workflow has proven general savings.

EXPLAIN YOUR APPROACH
What failure would make the workflow unacceptable even if faster?

Keep your artifact, corrections, evidence and limitations yourself.
Self-review is not independent assessment. No paid model calls are required.
Review notes: /paths/business/05/#practice