VetsLearn — Lead & evaluate AI use — 03: Evaluate vendor claims with task-specific evidence
Revision 2026-10-03; fictional training fixture.

OUTCOME
Turn promotional claims into inspectable acceptance questions.

INDEPENDENT TASK
Independent vendor claim: “cuts work in half.” Demo timed generation only on five easy tasks; review and correction excluded. Write a response requesting evidence and define six acceptance cases.

STEPS
1. Ask for total usable-task effort and quality results.
2. Include absent evidence, restricted access and a malformed input.
3. Record unresolved evidence rather than choosing a winner prematurely.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
- No unsupported savings endorsement.
- Cases reflect the intended workflow.
- Questions distinguish reported results from independently observed evidence.

EXPLAIN YOUR APPROACH
Which vendor answer would materially change your evaluation?

Keep your artifact, corrections, evidence and limitations yourself.
Self-review is not independent assessment. No paid model calls are required.
Review notes: /paths/leadership/03/#practice