Renee Ortiz writes grants for a regional food bank. Thirty-eight paid hours a week, plus job-search work on the side, as she wants to move into a development director role.
Her one-week audit produced 16 tasks. The big ones: drafting letters of inquiry (6.0 hrs), funder prospect research (4.5), donor impact reports (4.0), program budget tables (3.0), staff meetings (5.0), funder site visits (3.0), and email (5.5, which she split into funder correspondence and internal scheduling).
Scorecard results: LOI drafts scored 9. Language-heavy, the same five sections every time, weekly, and her boilerplate is not confidential. Impact reports scored 8. Prospect research scored 7. AI summaries help, but the tools invent foundation deadlines, so every fact needs checking against the funder's own site. Budget tables scored 4: the structure repeats, but the numbers come from finance and errors are expensive. Site visits scored 1.
Her median task time was 2 hours, so the leverage map put four tasks in the top right. Her top five, after pulling one quick win and one job-search task: LOI drafts, impact reports, prospect research, funder correspondence, and tailoring cover letters.
Those five total 17.5 hours a week. Renee's 90-day target: get 6 of those hours back. Not 17. The drafts still need her program knowledge and her relationships with funders, and one or two of her five workflow attempts will fail outright.
Her coworker Sam, also a grant writer, ran the same audit and got a different list. His week is heavier on compliance reporting and lighter on prospecting. Same job title, different map. That is the point of this stage.