Reading & watching

Reading & Watching. Curated. No filler.

Papers, books, channels, conferences, communities. Curated. No filler.

CURRENT AS OF 2026-06 // PAPERS 15 // BOOKS 11 // CHANNELS 12 // NEWSLETTERS 10 // CONFERENCES 8 // COMMUNITIES 12
01 // PAPERS

Papers.

The minimum reading list. Top ten in read order. Work through them once and the rest of the field reads more clearly. Bonus reading after.

  1. Foundational 2017

    Attention Is All You Need

    Vaswani et al.

    The transformer paper. Every model you use is descended from this architecture. Read it slowly. The math is approachable and the diagrams carry the load. If you only ever read one ML paper, this is it.

  2. Foundational 2018

    BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

    Devlin et al.

    The encoder-only branch of the family tree. Shows why pre-training on raw text then fine-tuning beat the older task-specific approach. Still the mental model behind most embedding and classification work.

  3. Foundational 2020

    Language Models are Few-Shot Learners (GPT-3)

    Brown et al.

    The paper where in-context learning showed up at scale. Long, but the early sections are the point: you can prompt a model into a new task without training. Everything since has been a reaction to this.

  4. Foundational 2022

    Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback (InstructGPT)

    Ouyang et al.

    How GPT-3 became useful. Introduces RLHF as a production technique. Read this before any alignment or fine-tuning paper. The data-collection sections matter as much as the algorithm.

  5. Foundational 2022

    Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models

    Wei et al.

    The shortest paper that changed how people prompt. Show your work, and the model does too. Pair with the Self-Consistency follow-up.

  6. Foundational 2022

    ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models

    Yao et al.

    The mental model behind every agent framework you will touch. Think, act, observe, repeat. The paper is more honest than most about where the pattern breaks.

  7. Foundational 2022

    Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback

    Bai et al.

    Anthropic's alternative to pure RLHF. Use a written constitution and AI critique to scale alignment work. Important for understanding how Claude is trained and for thinking about your own policy work.

  8. Foundational 2020

    Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks (RAG)

    Lewis et al.

    The original RAG paper. Most production AI work you do will be some variant of this pattern. The implementation has moved on, but the framing still holds.

  9. Foundational 2023

    Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model

    Rafailov et al.

    DPO killed off most RLHF pipelines for fine-tuning. Simpler, more stable, no separate reward model. Read this if you fine-tune at all.

  10. Frontier 2025

    DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

    DeepSeek-AI et al.

    The 2025 paper that showed reasoning could be trained with pure RL on outcome rewards, no SFT warm-start required. Triggered the reasoning-model wave you see across every lab. Read for the methodology and the honest ablations.

Bonus reading.

  • Federal-relevant 2023

    AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

    NIST

    The framework federal agencies and contractors point at when they say 'AI governance.' Not a paper in the academic sense. Read it if you sell to or work in the government. Pair with the Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1).

  • Foundational 2019

    Model Cards for Model Reporting

    Mitchell et al.

    The case for documenting what a model does, where it fails, and on whom it was evaluated. Short. Sets the bar for honest model release notes.

  • Federal-relevant 2025

    OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications

    OWASP Foundation

    Community-maintained list of the most common LLM-app security failures: prompt injection, insecure output handling, data leakage. Read before you ship anything user-facing. Updated yearly. Check the link for the current version.

  • Frontier 2023

    Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4

    Bubeck et al.

    Microsoft Research's case that GPT-4 was qualitatively different. Useful as a snapshot of the moment people stopped arguing about whether LLMs were a big deal. Cherry-picked examples and a contested framing. Read it with skepticism, not as gospel.

  • Frontier 2024

    Mixtral of Experts

    Jiang et al.

    The clearest write-up of a working sparse mixture-of-experts model at the time. Read this to understand why open-weights MoE took off and how the routing actually works. Pair with the Switch Transformer paper for the lineage.

02 // BOOKS

Books.

A working library. We tell you who each book is for and where it falls down.

  • Chip Huyen

    Who for: Engineers moving from notebooks to production. The clearest single book on ML systems.

    Dense but practical. The chapters on data distribution shifts and monitoring are the reason to buy it. Skip the intro if you already know the ML basics.

  • Chip Huyen

    Who for: Anyone shipping LLM-powered apps. The follow-up to Designing ML Systems.

    Best single source on RAG, evals, fine-tuning trade-offs, and inference cost. Some sections will age fast. Read it now.

  • Jay Alammar & Maarten Grootendorst

    Who for: Engineers who learn by doing. Pairs well with Alammar's Illustrated Transformer posts.

    Visual, code-forward, and current. Good bridge from foundations to applied work. Light on production concerns, so pair it with Huyen.

  • Andriy Burkov

    Who for: The fastest honest path through classical ML. Read this before anything thicker.

    Closer to 150 pages now. Math is present but not punishing. Burkov's follow-up Machine Learning Engineering is also good.

  • David Foster

    Who for: Engineers who want to understand generative models from the ground up: GANs, VAEs, diffusion, transformers.

    Code is in Keras/TensorFlow, which dates it slightly. The conceptual chapters hold up. Good for the why behind the how.

  • Louis-François Bouchard & Louie Peters

    Who for: Practitioners who want a survey of RAG, agents, and deployment patterns in one volume.

    Uneven. Some chapters are excellent, others read like blog posts stitched together. Skim the table of contents and read what you need.

  • Martin Kleppmann

    Who for: Every engineer. Not an AI book, but you will not build serious AI systems without this knowledge.

    Still the best book on distributed systems for working engineers. A second edition has been in progress; the first edition is fine.

  • Gene Kim, Kevin Behr, George Spafford

    Who for: Anyone who has watched a deploy go sideways and wondered why nobody learned. Translates directly to MLOps.

    It is a novel. Some find that cringey. The lessons are real. Pair with The DevOps Handbook if you want the practitioner manual.

  • Ron Kohavi, Diane Tang, Ya Xu

    Who for: Anyone running A/B tests or evals on AI systems. The bar for honest measurement.

    Written by the people who built experimentation at Microsoft, Google, and LinkedIn. Dense. Worth it.

  • Tyler Akidau, Slava Chernyak, Reuven Lax

    Who for: Engineers building real-time pipelines: feature stores, online inference, event-driven ML.

    Beam-flavored but the concepts generalize. The watermarks and windowing chapters are the payoff.

  • Richard Hamming

    Who for: The operator mindset book. Read it once a year.

    Lectures from a man who watched computing get built. Chapter on 'You and Your Research' is famous for a reason. Stripe Press reprint is the nice edition.

03 // CHANNELS

Channels.

YouTube, blogs, podcasts. Grouped by tier: foundational first, frontier next, federal last.

Foundational

  • Andrej Karpathy

    YouTube

    The Zero to Hero series and the LLM lectures are the single best free curriculum on how these models actually work. Watch with a code editor open.

  • 3Blue1Brown

    YouTube

    For the math. The neural networks and attention episodes give you the visual intuition the papers assume you already have.

  • AssemblyAI

    YouTube

    Practical engineering content on speech, transcription, and applied LLM patterns. Less hype than most channels.

  • Not an AI podcast. A clear-thinking podcast. The AI episodes are good; the rest sharpens how you reason about claims.

Frontier

  • Yannic Kilcher

    YouTube

    Paper walkthroughs by someone who reads them critically. Cadence has slowed; check recent uploads. _status as of 2026-06_

  • Conference talks from people shipping production AI. The eval and RAG talks are where the field is actually learning.

  • The most useful single blog in AI right now. Daily TILs, honest model reviews, and llm CLI tutorials. Read the archive.

  • Anthropic Research

    Blog/website

    Primary source for Constitutional AI, interpretability, and Claude's capability work. Read the originals, not the recaps.

  • Latent Space

    Podcast

    Swyx and Alessio interview the people building the stack. Long-form, technical, low fluff. Best AI engineering podcast.

  • Nathan Labenz goes deep with researchers and founders. Episodes are long. Worth it for the frontier-lab interviews.

Federal-relevant

  • The federal AI beat. Procurement, policy, agency rollouts. Necessary if you sell to or work for the government. _status as of 2026-06_

  • GovExec Daily

    Podcast

    Broader federal management, not AI-specific. Useful background for how agencies actually buy and deploy technology. _status as of 2026-06_

04 // NEWSLETTERS

Newsletters.

Email and RSS. Subscribe to two or three, not ten. Volume beats signal otherwise.

05 // CONFERENCES

Conferences.

The ones worth a plane ticket. Audience chip tells you who shows up.

  • AFCEA TechNet Cyber

    Federal/cleared

    Annual, typically May, Baltimore/DC area

    DoD cyber and AI procurement crowd. Vendor-heavy floor, but the cleared sessions and side meetings are the value. _status as of 2026-06_

  • AFCEA WEST

    Federal/cleared

    Annual, February, San Diego

    Sea services focus: Navy, Marines, Coast Guard. AI and unmanned systems tracks have grown. Good for west-coast cleared work.

  • AUSA Annual Meeting

    Federal/cleared

    Annual, October, Washington DC

    Army's big show. Massive vendor floor and warfighting function panels. AI sessions are growing but still secondary to platforms.

  • USENIX Security Symposium

    Federal/cleared

    Annual, August, varies

    Academic security with strong federal attendance. The ML security and adversarial AI papers land here. Not federal-only; co-located with academic crowd.

  • Multiple per year, San Francisco and NYC

    The conference for people shipping AI products. Talks are on YouTube after; go in person for the hallway track. _status as of 2026-06_

  • NeurIPS

    Academic/research

    Annual, December, varies (often Vancouver or New Orleans)

    The biggest ML research conference. Most engineers will get more from the papers than the in-person event. Workshops are the best part.

  • Annual, August, Las Vegas

    Inside DEF CON. The AI red-teaming and jailbreak research lives here. Pair with the main DEF CON if you do security work.

  • Varies. Anthropic Code with Claude and OpenAI DevDay run roughly annually.

    Vendor events. The product announcements and SDK changes are the substance. Recordings are usually posted within a week. _status as of 2026-06_. Check the lab's events page for the next one.

06 // COMMUNITIES

Communities.

Remote first, then in-person by city. Pick one or two. Community is a small habit, not a feed to scroll.

Remote

  • Who for: AI engineers shipping production systems. High signal, paper club, hiring channel.

    Invite linked from the Latent Space site. One of the few AI Discords worth real attention.

  • Who for: Claude builders. Good for SDK questions, MCP discussion, and Anthropic team presence.

    Official. Quieter than HuggingFace but higher quality for Claude-specific work.

  • Who for: Anyone debugging transformers, datasets, or training runs. Search-first community.

    Treat it like Stack Overflow for ML. The forums are more useful than the Discord for technical depth.

  • Who for: Paper announcements and occasional good discussion threads.

    Signal-to-noise has dropped since 2023. Filter to [R] and [D] flairs. Comments are uneven.

  • r/LocalLLaMA

    Reddit

    Who for: Anyone running models on their own hardware. Fast-moving, practical.

    Best place to track open-weights releases and quantization tricks. Some hype, mostly substance.

  • Who for: AI security, red-teaming, and adversarial ML. Active around DEF CON, quieter off-season.

    Discord invite from the site. The CTFs and writeups are the draw. _status as of 2026-06_

  • VetSec

    Slack

    Who for: Veterans in cybersecurity. AI/ML channel exists and is active.

    Free to join with proof of service. The mentorship and job channels are the real value.

  • Who for: Veterans learning software engineering, including ML tracks.

    Curriculum-first community. AI work is growing but not the primary focus.

  • Who for: Veterans transitioning into tech. General-purpose, not AI-specific.

    Older community, large network. Use it for mentorship and connections more than AI-specific help.

DMV

  • DC AI / Data Science Meetups

    In-person meetup

    Who for: DMV-area engineers wanting in-person events. Mix of federal and commercial crowd.

    Multiple groups exist (Data Science DC, DC AI, NoVA Data Science). Cadence varies by group. _status as of 2026-06_. Check each group's recent events before committing.

San Diego

  • San Diego AI / ML Meetups

    In-person meetup

    Who for: San Diego engineers. Navy and biotech crowd.

    No single dominant group. Search Meetup for current active ones. _unverified_ which specific groups are most active right now.

Huntsville

  • Huntsville AI

    In-person meetup

    Who for: Huntsville/Redstone engineers. Strong defense and aerospace overlap.

    Active meetup with regular talks. Good entry point if you work on or near the arsenal. _status as of 2026-06_