On-premises, disconnected, and open-weights operations
Trace every data path before claiming a setup is local-only.
In this lesson · G7 of 9
All lessons in this track →Progress for this track is saved in this browser only. No completion badge is issued. View your learning.
Start with the idea
Trace every data path before claiming a setup is local-only.
Where the model runs is only one part of the setup. Search, logs, backups and administration may use other destinations. Check the complete configuration and observed behavior.
Egress: Information or traffic leaving a defined system or network boundary.
See the example and check your understanding
A made-up teaching example
ORION runs the model locally. But it uses cloud services to turn text into search numbers and store error logs. “No data leaves” is not supported by that setup.
Ask yourself
Does localhost serving prove that all related work stays on the machine?
Show the explanation
No. Map every destination, use approved internal alternatives where required and test containment with invented data.
Start with these checks
- Include search preparation, logs and backups.
- Distinguish a drawing from observed enforcement.
- Demonstrate restoration and ownership.
Use the different practice case below and check every requirement in its full instructions.
The video explains the main idea. Use the sources, instructions and checks below to complete the practice.
Captions appear here during playback.
On-premises, disconnected, and open-weights operations
Trace every data path before claiming a setup is local-only.
Video playback is unavailable. Read the descriptive transcript below, go directly to practice, or open the video file.
Source-based teaching example · Fictional data · Reviewed 2026-10-03. Microsoft Mark · locally synthesized. On a small screen, use fullscreen for diagram details or read the transcript.
Read the descriptive transcript
0:00 · What you will learn
Trace every data path before claiming a setup is local-only.
What appears on screen
Trace every data path before claiming a setup is local-only.
0:06 · The idea
Where the model runs is only one part of the setup. Search, logs, backups and administration may use other destinations. Check the complete configuration and observed behavior.
What appears on screen
Where the model runs is only one part of the setup. Search, logs, backups and administration may use other destinations. Check the complete configuration and observed behavior.
0:21 · One useful term
Egress. Information or traffic leaving a defined system or network boundary.
What appears on screen
Information or traffic leaving a defined system or network boundary.
0:30 · A worked example
ORION runs the model locally. But it uses cloud services to turn text into search numbers and store error logs. “No data leaves” is not supported by that setup.
What appears on screen
ORION runs the model locally. But it uses cloud services to turn text into search numbers and store error logs. “No data leaves” is not supported by that setup.
0:44 · Your turn to think
Does localhost serving prove that all related work stays on the machine? Pause and decide before continuing.
What appears on screen
Does localhost serving prove that all related work stays on the machine? Pause the video if you need more time.
1:01 · Why this answer works
No. Map every destination, use approved internal alternatives where required and test containment with invented data.
What appears on screen
No. Map every destination, use approved internal alternatives where required and test containment with invented data.
1:12 · Check 1
Include search preparation, logs and backups.
What appears on screen
Include search preparation, logs and backups.
1:18 · Check 2
Distinguish a drawing from observed enforcement.
What appears on screen
Distinguish a drawing from observed enforcement.
1:24 · Check 3
Demonstrate restoration and ownership.
What appears on screen
Demonstrate restoration and ownership.
1:30 · Now try a different case
Open the lesson and try its different practice case. Use every check in the full task. Watching alone does not mark the lesson complete.
What appears on screen
Open the lesson Try the new case Check and revise The full task and its requirements are in the linked lesson.
Watching explains the example. Complete the lesson practice to check what you can do. Explore all visual lessons →
Prerequisites: distinguish generated output from source evidence; review the AI workflow reference. Public self-study is not official agency training, accreditation or a credential.
What you will be able to do
This lesson develops the ability to design bounded local operations with lifecycle controls. The setting is ORION Service Navigator, a fictional public-benefits information service using public guidance and wholly synthetic constituent questions; it never determines eligibility or takes an action on a person. Every person, organization, system record, metric, and outcome in the case is fictional. Do not replace the case with operational, classified, CUI, export-controlled, proprietary, employer-confidential, or third-party personal information.
By the end of the lesson, you will be able to:
- Demonstrate how to design bounded local operations with lifecycle controls.
- Apply that model to the synthetic ORION Service Navigator environment.
- Produce a reviewable artifact that separates evidence, assumption, uncertainty, and authority.
- Recognize the critical failure and select a safe remediation path.
The performance standard is not confident language. It is a traceable decision, an artifact another qualified reviewer can inspect, a clear boundary around the learner’s authority, and a safe response to uncertainty. Knowledge checks are formative and do not award a certification or endorsement.
This curriculum runs self-study on VetsLearn. Where the text calls for an instructor, peer or formal review, use the stated acceptance criteria for self-review. Reflection questions support reflection; they do not replace independent assessment. A peer review is optional unless your actual organization requires it.
Part 1 Disconnected configuration operations
Model, product, harness and compute are different axes. Open weights do not prove open-source licensing or trustworthiness. APIs can be local; local inference can still use hosted embeddings, tools, telemetry and backups. Containment covers the whole configuration. A disconnected runbook includes approved intake, provenance/hashes, dependencies, administrators, logs, timekeeping, backups, patches, restoration and export. Never install software on work hardware without approval. Capacity includes weights, cache, runtime and concurrency, so measure the workload.
Component and destination record
| Component | Version in synthetic case | Destination | Open question |
|---|---|---|---|
| UI | U1 | Appliance | Who can administer it? |
| Serving API | R1, localhost | Same appliance | Bind address and role enforcement? |
| Weights | W1, quantization Q4 | Appliance storage | Provenance/license verified? |
| Retrieval | Index I1 | Local files | Per-role filtering tested? |
| Embeddings | E1 default | Remote endpoint | Replace or obtain boundary review |
| Trace collector | L1 default | Hosted dashboard | Disable or establish approved path |
Intake and restoration procedure
Create an import manifest recording filename, publisher/source, exact version, license, expected cryptographic hash, dependency/runtime versions, authorized intake method and reviewer. In this simulated case, manifest H1 expects weights hash HASH-W1 and index hash HASH-I1; these are placeholders, not real cryptographic hashes. A mismatch blocks intake. A matching hash checks identity against the manifest; it does not establish publisher trust or authorization.
For the paper restoration exercise: (1) freeze the affected simulated service; (2) identify backup B1 containing W1, runtime R1, corpus D1, index I1 and policy P1; (3) compare manifest versions and hashes; (4) rebuild I1 from D1 if the index is corrupt; (5) run known query Q1 whose expected source is D1:notice-2; (6) run the role-denial fixture; (7) reopen only when outputs and configuration match the recovery criteria. If the backup contains unknown policy P0 or Q1 cites a different source, stop recovery and route the inconsistency. Never substitute an unreviewed model download to make restoration convenient.
Limits: the paper exercise demonstrates reasoning about recovery. Actual containment, throughput and restoration require authorized hardware tests and observation.
Part 2 Synthetic worked example
ORION runs local weights through localhost serving, but retrieval defaults to hosted embeddings and errors go to a cloud collector. Local inference is true; no-data-leaves is unsupported. The synthetic runbook specifies internal replacements and an egress test; real containment requires authorized configuration and observation.
Guided practice: identify the unsupported conclusion, name missing evidence and rewrite with its scope intact. Change one assumption and identify which decision reopens.
Part 3 Feedback and repair
Pass when localhost is distinguished from hosted access, destinations have owners and restoration is demonstrated. Disconnecting inference alone does not settle media, administrator or backup risks.
Keep failed evidence beside the repair. Explain the criterion, correct the artifact and test a different invented case.
Next step: carry your versioned artifact and failures into the next federal lesson; the capstone returns to these records. Check live policy and authorization with current official sources and responsible owners.